Monday’s Mtg: Is the U.N. Worth Having?

I thought this week would be a great slot for Carl’s topic on the relevance of the United Nations. Not only was it the organization’s 70th anniversary last week, but Monday will be the opening day of the 2015 UN conference on climate change in Paris. The conference (details here) is a big deal. Close to 200 nations will participate, with a goal of concluding the first ever binding, universal agreement to limit greenhouse gas emissions to keep global climate from warming beyond a stated amount.

Our last meeting on the UN was back in 2011, but we talked about global governance more generally last March.

I will open the meeting with a brief description of what the UN’s main functions are.  There are a lot of them and measuring their effectiveness is harder than it might seem.  but, it’s undeniable that the UN has many, many flaws and shortcomings.  Some of these were deliberately built in to limit the organization’s power and the ability of weaker nations to combine and challenge the major powers, but other problems are more self-inflicted by the UN bureaucracy and organizational culture. Still, the organization does some things well, or at least better than the nobody that would be doing them if there were no UN.

To me, the really interesting question is whether the UN is capable of adapting to the major problems facing the world in the 21st century, or whether it will grow increasingly overwhelmed and irrelevant. I have I mind a host of problems that I will list on Monday, like climate change, failed states, increasing refugee flows, new means of warfare (like cyber), emerging public health challenges, etc. I recently delivered a presentation on the prospects for better global cooperation via transnational organizations. (Gee, I hope it was more interesting than that description sounded.) I will pivot off of those remarks, but stay brief.

Here are some discussion questions I hope we can get to that I will use to guide our discussion. Also, a few links to info on what the UN does and the major criticisms of it and concerns about its future.

Discussion Questions –

  1. WHAT does the UN do; its major functions and activities? Formal versus informal powers. Relationship to other global govt orgs (IMF, EU, etc.)
  2. WHO/WHY: Whose interests does UN serve?
    1. Nations: Just the great powers, esp. USA? Other nations’ influence?
    2. Non-nations: NGOs and/or a growing “global civil society?”?
  3. COSTS of the UN:
    1. $$$: Who pays the UN bills. Is our share “fair?”
    2. How much control does the UN have over us? How much does it constrain U.S. freedom of action?
  4. BENEFITS: What does the USA get out of the UN? What does the rest of world get? What about when their interests clash?
    1. Is the world changing so as to make the UN more or less relevant?
    2. UN reform versus growing irrelevance.
    1. Why do conservatives hate the UN so? What do they propose?
    2. How do progressives (inc. Obama/Clinton) view the UN’s future role?


Next Week: Who Broke Congress and what if it cannot be fixed?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: