Monday’s Mtg: Can Our Political System Still Solve Problems?

Two weeks ago, we had a pretty good meeting debating whether our two-party political system is a cause or an effect of our current paralysis.  Dean and others thought the problem was that today’s politicians are less beholden to the public interest than in the past, while others (yo) said the paralysis is either the result of our extreme polarization or of one party’s refusal to compromise on anything, anytime

Monday is kind of a Part II meeting, but I changed the wording to encourage us to focus on something other than the system: The “solving” and the “problems” parts.  I believe our political gridlock is far, far more fundamental than issue polarization.  I think it’s a result of a basic disagreement about what our nation’s problems are and whether any e3ffort to resolve them that involves government is even appropriate.  I’m not even sure we have a national consensus about the legitimate ends of politics anymore, much less its means.

I’ll explain more what I mean by this in my opening.  Of course, there are other reasons to worry that our problems are particularly hard to solve these days that have less to do with the mismatch between polarization and the political system.  For example, some of our big problems tend to be international in scope and thus partially outside of our ability to fix (terrorism, climate change).  The Great Recession has made political cooperation harder, too.  But, I hope you’ll allow me to talk about more inside-our-own-political-system origins of Washington gridlock.  Frankly, I’ve never been more concerned about the functioning of American democracy, and my experience goes back 30+ years at this point.

Discussion Questions –

  1. Do Americans agree on what our big national problems are?  If not, why not?  Same questions for the solutions?
  2. Are elites more or less divided on these matters than the general public?   Is there actually a silent majority on the big questions?
  3. If there is a rough consensus on problems and solutions, why are our political leaders not acting?
  4. If no consensus exists, even among regular people, then why not?
  5. Have we reached a point where we are sharply divided on the ends (goals) of politics and not just the means to those ends?  If so, how did this happen – or is it really a new development at all (i.e., were we always sharply divided on basic questions)?

Links – [Lots of good ones!)

NEXT WEEK:    How do we judge which facts are true?  Dean helps us explore the basics of epistemology.


2 responses

  1. I have to agree. Our political system has become quite dysfunctional; in fact it has broken down.

  2. Republicans and Democrats are split sharply on whether and what to do about (1) inequality and (2) poverty.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: